It's been a while

I have not posted in a while since I have been busy with my senior project. We had our senior show at the Kachmann Gallery, and while I have not sold anything, I felt like I made a couple of good contacts.
My new pieces in my estimation are phenomal.
THere has been a bit of controversy. The images I took photos of are of stain glass windows in several churches, and then I reworked them into Rose Window Designs.
I took pictures in 3 different churches, and apparently of the 5 designs I created 3 of them were from the stain glass windows of a local artist. I guess he was concerned and his son was upset that I had done this. THey were worried about copyright, and people stealing their designs. Well for pete's sakes they are in public places, don't they think that people could go take their own pictures?
Anyway long story short I contacted a copyright attorney and he said I am fine. I have nothing to worry about. Here is what he had to say:

I feel confident that the issue here is whether your work is sufficiently original or creative to justify its own copyright protection (answer, "yes") and whether your copyrighted work would impair the window artist's ability to make and sell his own derivative works based on his own window (answer, "no").

The Ets-Hokin court] failed to appreciate that any derivative work must recast, transform or adopt the authorship contained in the preexisting work. A photograph of Jeff Koons' ``Puppy'' sculpture in Manhattan's Rockefeller Center, merely depicts that sculpture; it does not recast, transform, or adapt Koons' sculptural authorship. In short, the authorship of the photographic work is entirely different and separate from the authorship of the sculpture.
Nimmer Vol. 1: Sec.3.03(C)(1)

I think you're in the clear on this window issue.
******************************************************************************
So in my mind case settled......
Here are some the images